Case Analysis

Introduction The case named Tukaram & Anr. v State of Maharashtra[1]was a landmark case as far as rape and its laws are concerned. The incident took place in 1972, Chandrapur district of Maharashtra which shook the nation. The decision was given by the Supreme Court was something that caused outrage within the nation. Several protests

 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 251 OF 1982 DECIDED ON- 18.03.1982 CITATION: 1993 AIR 1608, SCR (2) 488   APPELLANT- D.S. DALAL V. RESPONDENT- STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.   HON’BLE JUDGE: – KULDIP SINGH – N.M. KASLIWAL, JJ [1]  HISTORY OF CASE: 1.      D.S. Dalal was a practicing Advocate

Citation of the case: (1860) 8 HLC 268 The original name of the case: Cox V. Hickman Sitting judges of the case: Lord Cranworth and Lord Wensleydale This is an example of one of the key elements of partnership-Mutual Agency. Mutual Agency Evidence cooperation is conclusive proof. In Section 18[1], the “partner is a representative

  INTRODUCTION: In these, the Chennai City Municipal Act, 1919 challenges the section 326A to 326J1in writ petitions. In these sections it cover ups about the definition of Hoardings whether it is for public or private or for any advertisement and not for any sale purpose or for any other purpose. These sections also includes

Abstract The levying of taxes by the state has always been in question regarding their validity and the enactment of legislation by the state for that purpose. The freedom that is provided under Article 301 of the Constitution sometimes creates a dilemma on whether the taxes come under the purview of the restriction on trade

Abstract The below case is a detailed analysis of whether or not the word rent includes just the rent of the land or building or the amenities attached with it also the accessories attached to it. ”building’, means a residential or non-residential roofed structure and includes: (i) any lead (including any garden), garages and outhouses,

Parties to the case: Petitioner: Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras Vs. Respondent: M/S Madurai Mills Co. Limited  Bench: Khanna, Hans Raj  Voluntary Liquidation: When a company decides to voluntarily dissolve itself the proper consultation of the shareholders. The dissolution of the company is not ordered by the court. Distribution of assets of the company: When

ABSTRACT Sexual offences are common in our country, India. It is a heinous crime which increases day by day. But in the last few years, these sexual offences with children increase so much and rapidly but the legislation did not have any special provision regarding sexual offences with children. In 2012, the legislation made law

CITATION: 1984 AIR 1622, 1985 SCR(1) 88  BENCH: JUSTICE. FAZAL ALI AND SYED MURTUZA  DATE OF JUDGEMENT: 17th JULY 1984  FORUM OR COURT: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[1] ACTS USED: INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872, INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 AND CONSTITUTION OF INDIA  ABSTRACT Evidence always plays an important role in the decision and conclusion of the