Abstract
In recent decades, euthanasia has become a pivotal issue in global legal and ethical discourse. As medical science continues to advance, prolonging life in situations that were once considered hopeless, societies around the world are grappling with the implications of intentionally ending life to alleviate suffering. This has raised awareness of the need to strike a balance between human dignity, medical ethics, and individual liberty. The right to pass away with dignity has become a major issue that goes against both social norms and established legal structures.
Different nations have approached this delicate topic in different ways; some have authorized some types of euthanasia under stringent guidelines, while others still forbid it completely for moral, cultural, or religious reasons. This paper seeks to examines the legal trends surrounding euthanasia in different jurisdictions, emphasizing significant laws and court rulings that have influenced the global discourse. We can learn more about the larger international legal environment around this complicated and dynamic topic by looking at how various countries have handled euthanasia.
Introduction
Particularly in the second half of the 20th century, the ethical and legal ramifications of euthanasia have emerged as a major area of discussion on a global scale. The debate over assisted suicide and euthanasia has gained prominence in many nations due to advancements in medical technology and a growing focus on individual rights. The deliberate taking of a life to stop suffering, or euthanasia, presents difficult issues with relation to medical ethics, individual autonomy, and the right to die.
Laws Across the World
Different nations have approached the practice of euthanasia in different ways, leading to important legislative acts and court decisions that have shaped our contemporary understanding of the matter. The events in a few of the major nations that have made significant strides on the matter are listed below.